OpenProof.science Evidence, review, reproducibility, and public record.
OpenProof Claim Unreviewed Solar physics / Heliophysics

Gleissberg (101yr) and de Vries (208yr) solar periodicities match precessional boundary resonances P/256 and P/128 within 3%

Submitted by Gene Madison

Data analysis From paper AI disclosed No elevated boundary

Main Claim

Analysis of SILSO v2.0 sunspot records (1749–2026) and the Steinhilber et al. (2012) cosmogenic isotope reconstruction (9,400 years) yields two periodicities matching harmonics of the 25,772-year precessional cycle: the Gleissberg period (~101 yr) matches P/256 = 100.7 yr within 0.3%, and the de Vries/Suess period (~208 yr) matches P/128 = 201.3 yr within 3.3%. Grand minima spacings additionally match P/64 (396 yr) and P/32 (705–805 yr cluster) within 2–5%.

Assumptions

- The precessional period (25,772 yr) is physically coupled to the galactic boundary crossing timescale — this is proposed but not proven
- The period matches are not coincidental results of testing many P/N fractions
- The cosmogenic isotope reconstruction accurately reflects solar activity variations over 9,400 years

Open Questions

- How many P/N fractions were tested? If many, Bonferroni correction applies and the matches may not be significant.
- Does the EPICA 800,000-year ice core record show the same periodicity pattern?
- Is there a proven physical mechanism connecting the precessional cycle to the galactic magnetic boundary?

Evidence Package

0 items

No evidence yet.

Add proof files, code, datasets, citations, simulations, or counterexamples.

Verification Tasks

0 open

No tasks opened yet.

Results, Cosigns, and Challenges

0 results

AI Use Disclosures

Code generation Claude (Anthropic)

Periodogram analysis, harmonic matching calculations, Steinhilber dataset processing.