OpenProof.science Evidence, review, reproducibility, and public record.
OpenProof Review Open review May 26, 2026

The Galactic Magnetic Reversal Boundary Hypothesis: Statistical Evidence for a Corridor Aligned with the Galactic Magnetic Field Reversal

Gene Madison

Preprint Astrophysics / Solar Physics v1 CC BY 4.0 PDF manuscript

Abstract

Open PDF in new tab

We present multi-dataset statistical evidence that the solar system is embedded near a galactic magnetic field reversal boundary — a "corridor" aligned with l=0°/180° in galactic coordinates, connecting the Golden Gate (Sagittarius direction) and Silver Gate (Taurus/Orion direction). Six converging lines of evidence support this identification, including external experimental confirmation from the DAMPE satellite (Nature, April 29, 2026).

galactic magnetic field cosmic ray acceleration solar activity Faraday rotation Gaia proper motion DAMPE Peters cycle interstellar medium galactic structure heliosphere Local Void

Manuscript

PDF preview preserves the uploaded document. LaTeX submissions render with richer sections, links, and references.

Download PDF
Page 100%

Loading PDF preview...

Transparency

Data availability
All primary datasets used in this analysis are publicly available. Gaia DR3 proper motion data: gea.esac.esa.int. IceCube ICECAT-1 alert track catalog: Abbasi et al. 2023, ApJS 269:25, doi:10.7910/DVN/SCRUCD. SOHO/LASCO CME catalog: cdaw.gsfc.nasa.gov/CME_list. SILSO sunspot number v2.0: sidc.be/silso. Pierre Auger top-100 UHECR events: opendata.auger.org, doi:10.5281/zenodo.4487612. Faraday RM catalog: Taylor, Stil & Sunstrum 2009, ApJ 702:1230. Analysis scripts are available from the author upon request.
Ethics
This study uses only publicly available astronomical datasets. No human subjects, animals, or sensitive personal data were involved. No ethics approval was required.
Funding
This research received no external funding. It was conducted independently, with analysis assisted by Claude (Anthropic). All data, scientific interpretation, and conclusions are those of the author.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests. This work was conducted as an independent investigation with no institutional affiliation, commercial sponsorship, or financial stake in the outcome. The author has no relationship with any of the instruments, collaborations, or datasets cited (Gaia, IceCube, DAMPE, Pierre Auger, SOHO/LASCO).

Research files

No figures or supplementary files were uploaded separately.

Claim Map

Add claim

Structured Reviews

0 reviews

No structured reviews yet.

Reviewer scorecards will appear here.

Open Review

0 comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.

Public critique, replication notes, and questions will appear here.